I'm confused.  Assuming that the users are separated from their servers by
at least one router hop (otherwise if the servers failed, so would the
users, so what's the use of the DR?), then why can't you just assign the
same IP addresses to the servers at the DR site?  If the production servers
are up, then the users would get routed to those servers.  If the servers or
server site fails, then the users would get routed to the DR site, with the
backup servers that have the same IP addresses.  I fail to see the issue.

Fred Reimer - CCNA


Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177  Cell: 770-490-3071  Pager: 888-260-2050


NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s).
If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please
notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.


-----Original Message-----
From: Luan Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 5:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DR Solution [7:74875]

Hi,

I was jsut looking at various options for having link redundancy adn 
site redundancy.
Just wanted to know the various solutions can be deployed for such a 
kindof requirement?

       
           ------------------
        |                                |------------------Router C ( 
Site B,DR Site which is
        |    ISP                      |                    in Standby , 
should
        ---------------------                    site A fails)
            |                |
            |                |
            |                |
            |                |
        ------            -----------
        Router A        Router B
    (Site A where A adn B are in VRRP)
       

1. Active servers behind Router A
2. Router B would kick-in if Router A fails.
3. Incase the site A fails,the traffic should be automatically diverted 
to Router C (Site B).
4. Site A will be replicated to Site B using a link between Site A and B.
5. Site A and site B has two different IP addressing schemes.
6. Instead of a single ISP, what would be the solution if Router C was 
conencted to a diffrent ISP?

The users (outside to Site A and B) will be accessing site A purely 
using IP addresses (no DNS). what would be the solution at ISP level to 
acheive the above reqmt?

If the applications were accessed using "names" GSLB would ahve been the 
solution.

Thanks
LP.
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74905&t=74875
--------------------------------------------------
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Reply via email to