It seems that your loadbalancing from the inside is not working. You will
have to verify that it's working on your internal network first before even
trying from the Internet. From the failure to telnet from the inside, that
seems to be the case. Anyway, I think your problem might be in the case
where you only have 1 interface configured. The way I did it was to bridge
the traffic between 2 interfaces so that all traffic from the web servers
will have to go through the LD otherwise it can't keep track of what's going
on. It's possible in you configuration, the server got the requests but
respond directly to the requester and bypassing the LD.
My $.02
Henry Ngo
""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8p99lr$dd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p99lr$dd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> yes the conduits have been setup ..
>
> regds
> Pushkar
>
> "andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > you are going from an outside to an inside on the pix, do you have
conuits
> > on the pix setup?
> >
> >
> > ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > 8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > hi friends,
> > > i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a
> > very
> > > simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the
internet
> > and
> > > one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. ..... and
inside
> on
> > > the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i want to
load
> > > balance ...
> > >
> > > i have natted the virtual IP in the firewall to a public IP .. and
> opened
> > > port 80 for incoming hits .... now this virtual IP is bound to the 2
web
> > > servers ...
> > >
> > > but the prob is that i donot get any inbound connections from outside
..
> > > also when i tried to telnet to port 80 of the virtual IP from inside
> also
> > ..
> > > i'm unable to do so ...
> > >
> > > also i have connected only one ethernet cable from the first ethernet
> > > interface on the LAN .. do i have to connect another cable from the
> second
> > > interface even though they are in the same n/w ??
> > >
> > > please can anyone help out ... this is ans SOS situation ..
> > > the config file is below .. please take a look ...
> > >
> > > Pushkar
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > : Saved
> > > : LocalDirector 416 Version 3.1.4
> > > syslog output 20.3
> > > no syslog console
> > > enable password 4d9b64f9ab66474af34252545443b8 encrypted
> > > hostname web_ld
> > > no shutdown ethernet 0
> > > no shutdown ethernet 1
> > > shutdown ethernet 2
> > > interface ethernet 0 auto
> > > interface ethernet 1 auto
> > > interface ethernet 2 auto
> > > mtu 0 1500
> > > mtu 1 1500
> > > mtu 2 1500
> > > multiring all
> > > no secure 0
> > > no secure 1
> > > no secure 2
> > > no ping-allow 0
> > > no ping-allow 1
> > > no ping-allow 2
> > > ip address 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0
> > > no rip passive
> > > rip version 1
> > > failover ip address 0.0.0.0
> > > no failover
> > > password cisco
> > > snmp-server enable traps
> > > no snmp-server contact
> > > no snmp-server location
> > > virtual 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp is
> > > virtual 172.16.0.253:443:0:tcp is
> > > real 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp is
> > > real 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp is
> > > name 172.16.0.4 web1
> > > name 172.16.0.10 web2
> > > name 172.16.0.253 domain
> > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp
> > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp
> > > : end
> > >
> > >
> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html
> > > _________________________________
> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html
> > _________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]