The collision domain consists of the switch port AND the E0 port on the 
router. It's very likely that they will send at the same time, which would 
cause a collision. This is normal CSMA/CD. If those are the only ports in 
the collision domain -- in other words, it's a point-to-point link -- then 
set it to full duplex. This allows both stations to send at the same time 
and not cause a collision.

This is one of those topics that erupts very often on the list. I suggest 
you check the archives for numerous responses to similar questions. Good luck!

Priscilla

At 10:40 PM 9/11/00, Pedro Quezada wrote:
>ther shoudl not be collision on a swiched port .by nature each port on a
>switch becomes a collison domain.Only one thing That came on to my mind as
>I read you statement .
>
>check the connection speed on the switched ports and force them to be the
>same on the connection port to r1 to the switch an r2 to the switch.
>
>
>
>Kuncoro Wijaya wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have also one problem regarding the a.m matters.
> >
> > We have a network conf. as follows :
> >
> > (((( INTERNET ))))
> >         |
> >         |
> >        (X) Router from ISP (R1)
> >         |E0 : 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> >         |     (a Class C, just for example)
> >         |
> >      |Switch|
> >         |
> >         |
> >         |E0 : 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
> >        (X) Our Router (R2)
> >         |E1
> >         |
> >   --------------------
> >   |     |     |     |
> >      Our Network
> >
> > In our router, R2, we have a command line like this:
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
> >
> > The static route (default route) is working, however,
> > when we look at the interface E0 of R2 (sh int e0), we
> > see a lot of collisions.
> >
> > Could the problem be arisen due to the nature of
> > ethernet connection (CSMA/CD), although we have used a
> > switch to connect to E0 of R1? And how to overcome
> > this problem as it is the service given by the ISP ?
> >
> > I need your analysis on this.
> >
> > Thanks in adv
> >
> > Kuncoro
> >


________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to