No problem with that. � Ole ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ �Ole Drews Jensen �Systems Network Manager �CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I �RWR Enterprises, Inc. �[EMAIL PROTECTED] � http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----Original Message----- From: Jared Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 6:06 PM To: Groupstudy Subject: VLAN design Group- � When implementing new VLANs, I like to use some sort of logic when assigning the numbers.� For example, if a customer was assigning one VLAN per wiring closet, and the customer has 4 floors, and one closet on each floor, I would use VLANs 11, 21, 31 and 41.� The first digit in the number represents the floor, and the second digit represents the closet number.� If there were multiple closets on a floor, I would use 42 and 43, etc. � This leaves VLANs 32-40 unassigned.� Is there any problem with this?� I cannot see one, but I thought I would check. � This wouldn't really work if they were implementing VLANs to group users based on common job function for example, and I understand that. � Thanks, Jared **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _________________________________ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
