I think you are incorrect! MCI WorldCom is scheduled to deploy some of the
edge stuff soon. It is not in the core yet!!
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Leon Bass wrote:
>
> > Like everything else, When it's new everyone wants a piece, can you talk
> > to anyone who has used it for at least 5 years, I doubt it.
> > Whoever is placing the future of their company on this brand new
> > technology better think twice.
>
> FUD. Many many backbones rely on Juniper....MCI Worldcom..........Level
> 3.......etc.
>
> > If you are smart, you better have an ole reliable Cisco box sitting
> > close by, just in case Juniper comes up with an error, the technical
> > support has not even seen yet, and You wouldn't know that would you, who
> > can you call and compare with, NOBODY.
>
> Umm, just one problem with that. Cisco does not make products at this
> time that have the packet processing capibility of Juniper.
>
> > New technology is fine and good, but rest assure there will be bugs,
> > don't even fool yourself, because if you do, YOU won't be in this field
> > very long.
> > Just a thought, a technical ONE.
>
> Many of the very people that made Cisco the de-facto standard are the ones
> behind Juniper..........some of the top engineers even.
>
> brian
>
>
>
> >
> > MR wrote:
> >
> > > Juniper products are much faster and cute. Look like your company is
> > > in right direction. Note... routing and session concept is going to go
> > > when optical products available. Cisco do not have time to figure out
> > > new technology...know only buying companies and making CCIE's.Martin
> > >
> > > "Nova Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > guys,
> > >
> > > My company wants to buy Juniper routers instead of Cisco.
> > > Having never worked with Juniper equipment before I don't
> > > know why it's so good.
> > >
> > > I'm told that it's faster, cheaper and has a smaller foot
> > > print? What's a foot print? Is it really better then Cisco?
> > >
> > > Nova Rich
> > >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
