http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl

have fun.

BTW, just got back from taking the CCDA.....Passed, but those Case studies 
had me squirming in my chair! ;^)

Cheers,

Lance

>From: "Niraj Palikhey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: COLT tests
>Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:00:23 EDT
>
>How would I take the Colt tests? Are these the same practise tests on the 
>Cisco web site that is for registered CCO users? I forget the url but does 
>anyone know the url? I would appreciate it.
>Thank you.
>
>
>
>>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: COLT tests
>>Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:38:42 PDT
>>
>>Yes, If the COLT tests were tires, I'm afraid they would be Firestone
>>Wilderness series.......complete with the deflating effect
>>
>>(Sorry, couldn't help it).
>>
>>Lance
>>
>>
>>>From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Re: COLT tests
>>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:10 CDT
>>>
>>>Thank God its not just me.  I took 2 of the Colts as a pre-assesment for
>>>taking BCSN, and thought I had no chance of ever passing the real thing 
>>>and
>>>should learn to change tires instead!!  I feel a lot better knowing that
>>>they really are as awful as I thought they were.
>>>
>>>Whew!
>>>-Ejay
>>>
>>>
>>>----Original Message Follows----
>>>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Re: COLT tests
>>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:27:34 PDT
>>>
>>>I think I have to agree.
>>>
>>>I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the
>>>book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52.  The questions I
>>>missed
>>>were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press).  
>>>The
>>>test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have 
>>>multiple
>>>correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are
>>>literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are
>>>allowed
>>>to pick just one.  It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but
>>>this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Lance
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>Subject: Re: COLT tests
>>>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500
>>>>
>>>>COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I
>>>>counted
>>>>over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers
>>>>listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to 
>>>>get
>>>>through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on
>>>>the
>>>>real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous 
>>>>questions,
>>>>badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they 
>>>>require
>>>>a
>>>>Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made
>>>>any
>>>>attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they
>>>>are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were
>>>>paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is 
>>>>my
>>>>belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some
>>>>hired
>>>>third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about
>>>>(let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment
>>>>to
>>>>Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even 
>>>>showing
>>>>the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse 
>>>>to
>>>>make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it 
>>>>as
>>>>a reference to make sure that you have covered the material. The real 
>>>>exam
>>>>has a few nebulous questions, but not to the extent that the assessment
>>>>exams do.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>MLC
>>>>   "Lonnie Paschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>>8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>>>   They are practice beta exams that are avaialable to cco login users. 
>>>>No
>>>>charge, excellent rescource!
>>>>     "Ricardo Ciganda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>>C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01">news:C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01...
>>>>     Hi all!
>>>>
>>>>     I would like to know what is the finality of the COLT tests. May I
>>>>have to paid for this or is only a simulation of a test?
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>>     Ricardo Ciganda
>>>>     Dpto. de Sistemas
>>>>     Bytemaster Servicios Informaticos S.A.
>>>>
>>>
>>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>>
>>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>>
>>>_________________________________
>>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>
>>_________________________________
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to