But will this satisfy the evident "bloodlust" out there ? The pillowcase
with the doorknobs is a reasonable start , but I can't help thinking that
will only have the masses howling for more... Perhaps adding special
castration pliers , the old bamboo up the fingernails and an iron maiden or
two will suffice . Then some kind of court type situation would probably
help , I know a guy selling cheap Kangaroos if that's any help. If the
passions still haven't abated at that point , going to Salem and checking
out the witches is an option ,
Rgrds
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dale Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
>
> Gee,
>
> Maybe a few of us should get together and meet him in the parking lot one
> night. Who wants to carry the pillowcase with the doorknobs in it???
>
> >From: "Mark Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Mark Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Raul F. Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
> >Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:35:36 -0400
> >
> >Raul-
> >
> > I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by pinging an large number
of
> >hosts simultaneously. I asked him (the bogus ccie) why he thought that
> >would
> >bring down the firewall? His reply? "The fact that I pinged more than 50
> >hosts rapid fire caused the NT and Solaris servers on the LAN to start
> >flooding the wire with excessive SMB traffic, and since the firewall saw
> >that much SMB traffic it thought I was an intruder and shut down the
> >interface I was attached to." Real reason: The old Firewall one software
> >had
> >a bug that misallocated memory for packet queues on internal interfaces.
My
> >excessive pinging caused the queue to overflow and the software itself
> >crashed. An update fixed the problem. At least that was what the data
> >center
> >manager told me.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> >Raul F. Fernandez
> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:57 AM
> >To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
> >Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> >
> >
> >Dear folks,
> >
> >I have to agree with Tim on this one. It may have been possible that the
> >person at this site just did not pay enough attention to the question
posed
> >or that he may not known the answer. I do not know thew nature of the
> >question. Perhaps Mark could be kind enough to let us know what the
> >question was or were. Now depending on the nature and difficulty of the
> >question it may justify his not being able to answer it. If he is lying
he
> >should be disciplined because he lied and because he has taken for
granted
> >all the blood sweat and tears that goes into getting a CCIE. I think too
> >many folks get caught up in the CCIE and forget all the real hard work
that
> >goes into it. Basically, if he does not know the answer to a perplexing
> >question he should at least be able to outline a troubleshooting plan to
> >find it.
> >
> >Raul
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:51 AM
> >Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> >
> >
> > >Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets
> >face
> > >it guys, there is nobody out there that knows everything about
> >everything,
> > >and if there is someone that thinks they do, I guarantee there is
someone
> > >else out there that knows more than they do. Obviously if this guy is
> >lying
> > >about his CCIE he should be exposed, and after reported it is up to
Cisco
> >to
> > >deal with as they see fit.
> > >
> > >.02
> > >
> > >Tim
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Sam LI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "Mark Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:41 AM
> > >Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> > >
> > >
> > >Well, even some real one behave like this, i come across a few in the
the
> > >past
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM
> > >Subject: Possible phony CCIE
> > >
> > >
> > >> Greetings-
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a
CCIE.
> >He
> > >> even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I think it
is
> >the
> > >> CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with laurels and has the
> >words
> > >> Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it as well. After
asking
> > >this
> > >> person a few questions, I became suspicious of his credentials due to
> >his
> > >> apparent lack of knowledge of the fundamentals. (I never asked for
his
> > >CCIE
> > >> number because I attempted verification only after I left the
account).
> >I
> > >> faxed a copy of the business card he gave me (homemade BTW) to
someone
> >in
> > >> the CCIE program at Cisco. She told me the card is bogus and that
she
> > >would
> > >> send the card to the Cisco lawyers. That was three months ago and
this
> > >> person is STILL working on site there. What do you people think I
> >should
> > >do
> > >> now? Send e-mail to the persons that are contracting him there? He is
> > >> charging a very high bill rate. The people he is working don't have
> >enough
> > >> knowledge to confirm his credentials. Should I let this go? Isn't
part
> >of
> > >my
> > >> cert agreement with Cisco to protect the logo? I feel that Cisco
isn't
> > >doing
> > >> anything to protect us here.
> > >>
> > >> Mark Cohen
> > >> CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
> > >>
> > >> _________________________________
> > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >
> > >_________________________________
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >_________________________________
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
