The idea is to have EIGRP accurately select the best path based on the
actual traffic that the interface can pass. If you have multiple PVC's that
have different CIR's, then a single setting will cause it not to reflect
accurate path metrics. It becomes even more complicated if the sum of the
CIR's exceedsthe actual bandwidth of the frame-relay delivery mechanism.
(t-1...)
----Original Message Follows----
From: "info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bandwidth statement on Frame Relay interface
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:59:39 -0400
I've read a couple books that recommend setting the
bandwidth equal to the CIR on a Frame subinterface.
....as opposed to the port size....in an EIGRP environment.
Anyone out there do it differently? Any recommendations
or rules of thumb to apply to this issue?
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
