A couple of options to look at, that may or may not be suitable for what you
want to do.
Static routes? If urgent traffic is to one destination and ordinary traffic is
to a different destination, static routes may be suitable - but I expect your
requirement isn't that simple.
Policy based routing? I've never used this, so can't comment much on it, but it
sounds like it could be what you need.
Have a look at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/plicy_wp.htm for a
blurb on it.
For simple load balancing over two unequal links with OSPF, you would need to
change the cost of the links to be the same, using the 'ip ospf cost' interface
command. This will make OSPF think the two links are equal paths - it does not
do unequal cost load balancing.
JMcL
---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 07/11/2000 08:44 am
---------------------------
Zhang Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/11/2000 06:47:56 pm
Please respond to Zhang Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject: ospf question --sorry for not clear
Dear droup,
The question I post today may be not make you clear.What I mean is:
Can I make ordinary trafic through one leased-line and urgent trafic
through another leased-line,that is ,can I control the behavior of
load-balance.And how?
thanks again
dean
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
