I have a 3810, it is NOT cheap.  The 2600 series is modular, so more useful
in the long run.  The 2600 requires both a voice processor card ($750-1200,
1 or 2 VIC support) and the personality card (VIC - $300 new) to do voice.

The least expensive way to go is get a 1750.  The 1750 uses the same
personality (VIC = FXS, E&M, FXO) cards as the 2600 and you do not need the
extra (expensive) voice processor card like the 2600.  You can get a new
1750 for about $1600, add $300 for a FXS and you are ready to go, with VPN
to boot!  Used, you can find one for about $1000.00 with voice, or buy a
used 1750 alone for $500-$800 and spend $300 for the new voice card (VIC).
The VICs have 2 ports per card.  The 1750 has 3 card slots, 1 is dedicated
to VIC use. the other 2 can be other WAN cards or VICs.

You may be able to get a used 2600 with voice for $1500.00 (Usually a FXO,
the FXS is better for home use since you can plug a regular phone directly
into it) .  The 3810 is even more expensive.

Also remember, You need access to 2 voice routers to make it useful.

Jon


"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I am wanting to add voice to my lab.  I was thinking a cheap way to do
> with was some 26xx routers and voice cards.
>
> What about the MC3810 though?  Does that use the same
> commands/configuration as any other FXO/FXS etc?  I mean, can I
> essentailly use it as good as a 2610 for example as far as doing voice
> scenerios?
>
> Brian
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to