On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Robert Borejszo wrote:
> Hello:
> Excuse me if this kind of question doesn't belong here. I am in the process
> of preparing for CCNA and reading Wendell Odom book (BTW, any wanna be CCNA
> read this one regardless what others have to say). I am in WAN section right
> now. In his example of partially meshed network ( routers A B C D, A
> connects to B C D and A is only the router connected by B C D). I understand
> why we need subinterfaces on router A. But why we he has subinterface set on
> routers B C D? Is it because of setup consistency or what is the catch?
he could use physical interface, but just chose sub-interface. IMHO,
sub-interface (point to point) is the way to go, since then you don't have
problems with split-horizon, ospf, etc.
Brian
>
> Thanks,
> Robert Borejszo
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
