Phil,
you wrote:
e.g before this LAB the Ethernet Seg was split, so
that I just had a linear network and this worked
perfectly. Obviously when I triangulated it, I put
both Ethernet interfaces on the same network. But that
was about it really.
Although this config "should" be simple, it's the simple things that often
get overlooked. If the ethernet networks weren't connected before and
everything worked as expected - and then things don't work as expected once
you connect them.......... one might assume.......
Kevin Wigle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Phil Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cisco GroupStudy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: IP RIP V.1 in the LAB ?
> Thanx for the input,
>
> Unfortunately the configs are 120 miles away. I only
> really get a chance to play at the weekends when I'm
> back home.
>
> But there is really nothing fancy in the configs.
> When I cut the link TOP->RIGHT I waited for the route
> to get flushed out the table i.e 280 secs (I think)
>
> But the route from LEFT is definitely being advertised
> to RIGHT according to the Sniffer and being rejected
> by RIGHT. (Split Horizon Possibly)
>
> TOP Learned two routes to Network LEFT->RIGHT via LEFT
> and RIGHT Respectively and load balanced them.
>
> I would have thought this to be the case with LEFT and
> RIGHT also since RIP only has hop count to work with.
>
> Split Horizon thoughts ....
>
> RIGHT learned the TOP->LEFT network via TOP.
> RIGHT didn't learn the TOP->LEFT Network via LEFT ?
> and didn't load balance.
>
> When I broke the link I used shutdown.
> Maybe I should have physically uncoupled the link ?
>
> Although the route did get flushed. So RIGHT should
> have learned a new route to TOP->LEFT via LEFT.
>
> Ohhhhhhhh, I'm confused.
>
> If there is no progress I'll try to post the configs.
> But they are so straight forward its untrue.
>
> e.g before this LAB the Ethernet Seg was split, so
> that I just had a linear network and this worked
> perfectly. Obviously when I triangulated it, I put
> both Ethernet interfaces on the same network. But that
> was about it really.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
>
> --- Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov
> 2000, Kevin Wigle wrote:
> >
> > > which is cool but........
> > >
> > > > > When I cut the link Top-Right the Network
> > Top->Left is
> > > > > eventually flushed out ???
> > >
> > > why does the above route disappear? The loop is
> > gone and the network should
> > > now be advertised as avail through router Left.
> >
> > Well no doubt if you cut the Top-Right link, and the
> > Left was learned
> > via Top-Right.........that particular route should
> > disappear. I would
> > think/hope that if he waited long enough, that
> > things would start to
> > converge and Left would be re-learned via Left-Right
> >
> > >
> > > According to Phil's post that's not happening.
> > (right?)
> > >
> > > It would still be great to see more info on
> > configs and routing tables.
> >
> > I agree
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Kevin Wigle
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Network Administrator
> > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> >
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
