Nooo. To find CIR through Bandwith statement is not a right criteria becausee
if we are using IGRP/EIGRP , we need to play with Bandwidth statement to
select primary and secondary routes so we might need to change them different
as Actual CIR,..
IF we are using ATM links, we could surely find it but
I donot know weather there is any other criteria to determine this for FR??
Faisal Athar.
"Jason A. Diegmueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well is this BW statement based on the bandwith statement entered in the
> config for a routing protocol to use? I dont think this command will give
> you the acutal CIR of the circuit.
> I maybe wrong...let me know.
The BW statement in the "show frame-relay map" command represents
the CIR as presented to your equipment from the Frame Relay
Switch. Your "bandwidth" setting will not affect this output.
I ran in to a situation a few weeks ago where on our new PVCs we
were no longer receiving CIR declarations in the LMI updates from
MCI's Frame Relay Switches--it turned out all the PVCs were
provisioned with 0 CIRs (yes, zero). After fixing them, we now
see BW statements again.
This is an extremely useful benefit of Cisco-style LMI, as it
can often save you a call to your provider to verify CIRs.
I know it does me.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
