In defence of my earlier position that "d" is in fact the other correct answer.
"Priscilla's Point:
>Besides, as I look more closely at the answer, I see that it says,
>"excessive link-state entries in the link-state table." What's a link-state
>table? I think the test writer put a few good-sounding words together to
>throw you off.
>
>Conclusion: D is wrong.
>
I would argue that that RFC 2328 describes the repository for link/state information
as the link state database. I personally feel that a substitution of database for
table is acceptable. I think we would all agree, that a large number of prefix's
would lead to a proportionally large table/database of link states.
Here is an excerpt from 2328
"The collected link state advertisements of all routers and networks forms the
protocol's link state database."
However, if D is wrong, which of the other 2 are right? I would tend to think that D
is the least wrong of the three remaining choices. Overall, I think this is another
example of technical lack of precision leading to unnecessary ambiguity.
Pete
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
