It is not necessary to redistribute static routes into a routing protocol in
order for statics to appear in the routing table. They will show up as "S"
in the table IF there is a route available.

You do NOT need to have a routing protocol enabled in order to route.
Routing can be done entirely with static routes. It's not pretty, and it's
not fun, and it's a lot of work as networks grow, but it is possible.

If Mr Lists Wizard had used an interface destination  ip route 179.70.32.13
S0, for example, the route would appear in his table, routing protocol or
not. But because there is no 179.70 network in his routing table, and
because it is not directly connected, the router will not place it into the
table. I presume this is intentional. One way to test is to create a
loopback with the desired address and see if the route then appears. Hint -
I just tested it on one of my routers. It does.

HTH

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From:   Jason Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:23 PM
To:     'Chuck Larrieu'; 'Cisco group study'
Subject:        RE: Static route does not appear in routing table

well what i think the problem is that the routing protocol is not
redistributing the static routes.

to distribute them.
eg

ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.1

router eigrp 30
redistribute static route-map static-routes
.
.
.
route-map static-routes permit 10
match ip address static-routes
.
.
.
ip access-list standard static-routes
remark 10 network
permit 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

this is of course to redistribute specifi static routes and not others.

or simply you could do

router eigrp 30
redistibute static


Regards,

Jason Baker
Network Engineer
MCSE, CCNA




-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:10 PM
To: Jason Baker; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table


Can you provide and example? I'm a bit confused as to what this
accomplishes.

Thanks

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From:   Jason Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, November 15, 2000 7:50 PM
To:     'Chuck Larrieu'; Lists Wizard; 'Cisco group study'
Subject:        RE: Static route does not appear in routing table

how about creating an access list..

then adding this access list to a route map.


Regards,

Jason Baker
Network Engineer
MCSE, CCNA


-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:59 PM
To: Lists Wizard; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table


If I were to guess I would say it is because there is no 179.70.32.13
network

Your directly connected networks are 170.something. there are no other
routes known to the router. Therefore it says "I got no idea where this
destination address is so I won't bother with it" :->

Or something like that.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Lists Wizard
Sent:   Tuesday, November 14, 2000 7:14 PM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Cisco group study';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Static route does not appear in routing table

I configured static ip route but i will not appear in the ip routing table.
Below is the output of some commands.

Can some one explain this?

Thanks
Lists Wizard


############################################################
Router-12(config)#ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 179.70.32.13
Router-12(config)#^Z
Router-12#
%SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
Router-12#sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
default
       U - per-user static route, o - ODR

Gateway of last resort is not set

     170.70.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C       170.70.32.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1
C       170.70.21.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
Router-12#sh ip route st
Router-12#


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to