Different ports must be on different IP Addresses, which also implies
different subnet masks. For example, you could use
IP Address 207.102.99.125 Subnet 255.255.255.252 for their Serial
IP Address 207.102.99.126 Subnet 255.255.255.252 for distant-end Serial
IP Address 207.102.99.133 Subnet 255.255.255.192 for Ethernet
IP Address 207.102.99.134 Subnet 255.255.255.192 for host
The other way around this would be to use IP unnumbered ethernet 0 for your
serial interface
HTH
Geoff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Devrin Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 2:07 PM
Subject: Asigning ip addresses
> I have a customer that sent me this ip addressing scheme:
> distant-end serial int :207.102.99.132
> their serial int :207.102.99.133
> their ethernet: 207.102.99.134
> host on their side:207.102.99.135
> all using the 255.255.255.192 mask
> When I try to use this addressing scheme on the router I get the error
> message that the subnets overlap. Why can't the lan and wan be on the same
> subnet? What are the ways around this?
>
> Devrin Gaskin
> E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
