I can confirm this with both Sprint & UUNET. All you have to do is show
justification and they'll give them to you (as they have to show
justification to ARIN). For us, it was a piece of cake as we were leaving
other ISPs, so the blocks we already had, we just listed that we needed
replacements for them and didn't have to detail anything other than
percentage of current use.
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Edward Watson wrote:
>
> > What are ISPs charging for a single Class C?
>
> We bundle it with certain dedicated services, if the user can justify if
> by ARIN guidelines. A /24 costs me $78 a year from ARIN. We will make
> these available to users who can justify it, for example when they
> purchase t1 or multi-meg services. A user has to show that NAT is not a
> viable option or has been explored as an option. They have to justify 80%
> of a /25 before we will move them to a /24.
>
> Brian
>
>
> >
> > Edward Watson
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
