Re: Cisco PIX 525 Vs Netscreen 100 Firewall

[Chris Larson]

I have used it as well. It is a good solution if you will not need to scale to multiple DMZ's, and won't need to create any VPN tunnels to a PIX. The 100 only has an insed, outside and DMZ.     "NetEng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8vu1kk$cuq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8vu1kk$cuq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We use Netscreen and it easy to setup and configure (it has a WebUI). We've > had it up and running for about 7 months and have not had a problem with it > yet and seems to be doing well. > > "Lim Kok Hua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi > > > > > > Anyone can give comment on the Cisco Pix 525 vs the Netscreen 100 > > Firewall? Both are hardware based firewall. I have heard little about > > Netscreen 100 Firwall (except from the www). Any user of Netscreen can > > advise ? > > > > Thanks > > > > _________________________________ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _________________________________ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >