Hi!
On Ethernet it's impossible without some kind of repeater or low-end
gateways.
Try to configure NT server with two Ethernet NICs on i386 computer and try
to load it with many computation and bus manipulating - you'll get PROPER
delay.
On Serial 'clock rate' is helpful, but real satellite delay is longer.
--
WBW, xander
CCNP+Voice, CCIE Lab 19-20/04/2001
> At 11:06 AM 12/6/00, you wrote:
> >Hi Priscilla,
> >
> >Is there a way to increase the round trip delay (expected delay 400ms)
> >between two back to back connected CISCO routers using an IOS command.
> >
> >This is to simulate a satalite link delay between two CISCO routers (
> >approximately 400-600 ms) on a test bench.
> >
> >Appriciate your attn and response.
> >
> >Thanks
> >msrfernando
>
> Hmmmmm. That's a good question. I'm thinking aloud here....
>
> You can reduce the bandwidth with the bandwidth command, and then delay
> increases. But that is just from the point of view of EIGRP routing
> metrics. To really increase the delay is a lot harder. You could add a
> bunch of access lists and other features so that the router gets bogged
> down processing, but it would be a lot of work to get this calibrated to
> the exact delay that you want.
>
> Could you use a simulation tool instead? Have you looked into Cisco's
> Netsys product? Another good product is NetPredictor from
> http://www.netpredict.com.
>
> You should send this question to the Cisco Group Study list. I hope you
> don't mind if I copy them. Any ideas, folks? Thanks.
>
> Priscilla
>
> ________________________
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
