Thats a silly comment. They compete directly and have very similar product
lines. As a side note, I happen to prefer Foundry due to my past
experiences and it does deliver better bang for the buck and features at
wire speed (ie, that don't melt the router if you turn them on). Juniper
does also. Cisco may figure it out one day, or just continue to hemorage
market share.
andy
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Perry Lucas wrote:
> I am a bit curious myself on that. Foundry is more oriented to webfarms and
> load balancing while extreme is oriented to Enterprise datacenters and MANs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> LaRoy Slaughter
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Wireless Networking
>
>
>
> Please explain your choice here.
>
> Quncy Lau wrote:
>
> > If you don't need VLAN and VLAN routing. I suggest Catalyst 6509.
> > If you need VLAN and VLAN routing, I suggest you not to use Cisco.
> > Let's try Extreme or Foundry
> >
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
