Your users will will get 1 host per address under NAT unless you
specifiy overload command. I beleive then that any additioanl users will
use the last address in the pool and PAT on that address.
-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Walling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Behavior of Cisco PAT/NAT?
If I set up a NAT pool of only 1 address, the router/pix uses PAT.
Under
PAT, I can have 65K hosts (or connections from hosts) connecting to the
internet.
If I set up a NAT pool of more than 1 address, the router/pix uses NAT.
Under NAT, I can have 1 host per address in the NAT pool.
Does this sound right? I have two available address to get my users out
with. If I put them both in a pool, will I only get two out at a time,
or
will it allow 65K connections per address in the pool? The
documentation
seems fuzzy on this.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
