to summarize then:
bridging (low,low)
- lowest priority root
- lowest port cost forwarding
router ids (highest lb,up/up int)
dr/bdr (highest priority)
HSRP active (highest priority)
routing decision outbound (high)
(highest value weight, local pref)
routing decision advertised as best inbound (low)
(lowest value med)
queueing (high to low)
priority - 0..3 high..low
custom - 0..16 high..low
""dre"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
91rhqs$jee$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91rhqs$jee$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> spanning tree root bridge - lowest priority (default 32768)
> ospf router id - highest ip address of a loopback int, if none: highest
> up/up interface
> ospf dr and bdr - highest priority segments become dr, second highest
> becomes bdr
> bgp router id - highest ip address of a loopback int, if none: highest
up/up
> interface
> bgp local pref - higher local pref is favored over a lower local pref
> (default 100)
> bgp weight - higher weight is favored over a lower weight (default 32768)
> bgp med - lower med is preferred over a higher med (default 0)
> isis dis - highest interface priority (default 64), tie goes to highest
snpa
> hsrp - higest primrary ip address for group x will become active (default
> 100)
> custom queueing - lowest queue is serviced first (0 to 16)
> priority queueing - high, then medium, then normal, then low
> igmp v2 query - lowest ip address on multicast segments elected as the
> querying router
> pim sparse mode dr - highest ip address on pim segments becomes pim dr
> local tdp id - highest ip address of a loopback int, if none: highest
up/up
> interface
>
> hope that helps.
>
> -dre
>
> ""Charles Henson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 91rdst$bqt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91rdst$bqt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Is there any logic or rule of thumb that can be used to remember what is
> > selected by the lowest value and what is selected by the highes value?
> > IE.....STP root bridge designation is based on the LOWEST mac. OSPF DR
is
> > based on the highest priority. Each one has to do with it's own subject
> > matter I know but I can't seem to get them all separated and on the
> written
> > that could encompass several questions.
> > (written scheduled for this friday)(confidence is not high)
> >
> > Charles
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
