I've commented to Cisco on every single test, going as
far as to include my eMail information in the comment.
Priscilla has tried to contact Cisco as well, and
without success as I understand it. It is unfortunate
that Cisco does not seek out a few of the more active
members of this board to provide Alpha information on
the test and, better yet, acknowledge the fact that
people care enough to comment on the examination. My
fear is that they feel the don't have to, can now
charge for the betas, and still maintain demand in the
industry. I, for one, have seen a definate waining
from enterprise customers for certifications - in
fact, one of my smaller customers wrote a description
stating "No CCIEs" recently under the guise that they
wanted a junior operations person.

Congrats on passing.


--- Lou Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No I have NEVER gotten feedback... Never....
> And I have commented on all my CCNA, DA, NP, and DP
> test...  I have pointed
> out a few glaring incorrect answers/questions and a
> few I am pretty sure...
> I also asked on a few questions why ask this... is
> there a point to a CCxx
> knowing how to spell this?
> In the end it is not the contact I want but knowing
> that my comment was read
> and if I was right... the problem addressed.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Chuck Larrieu
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 6:02 PM
> To: Kevin Wigle; Robert Padjen; Scott Brenner;
> Andre' Paree-Huff;
> Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
> Subject: RE: CID passed with 839, CCDP complete,
> details inside
> 
> 
> I failed the CID first time through, passed it
> second time. On both tests
> there was a particular question, which fell into a
> "security" category ( in
> my mind anyway )  There were 3 wrong answers and one
> right answer. I will go
> to my grave convinced that  there is an error on the
> test, and the real
> question is "which of these is NOT" rather than
> "which of these IS"
> 
> BTW - anyone EVER gotten any feedback from Cisco on
> comments made during the
> test on test questions? I didn't think so.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Wigle
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 2:51 PM
> To:   Robert Padjen; Scott Brenner; Andre' Paree-Huff;
> Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
> Subject:      Re: CID passed with 839, CCDP complete,
> details inside
> 
> Congratulations, another set of initials always
> feels good!
> 
> I also believe it is a single question.  I barely
> passed the CID when I took
> it but I got the security question correct.
> 
> Couldn't say what it was though........ many have
> commented on the famous
> security question but no one seems to remember it. 
> I believe it might not
> really be security related but labeled that way.
> 
> anyway - congrats!
> 
> Kevin Wigle
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Scott Brenner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andre'
> Paree-Huff"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, 21 December, 2000 13:11
> Subject: RE: CID passed with 839, CCDP complete,
> details inside
> 
> 
> > Its a single question, and, I believe, it is not
> the
> > one that it would appear to be. By unofficial
> polling
> > I'd say 70+% get it 'wrong.'
> >
> > Congrats.
> >
> >
> > --- Scott Brenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I took the CID on 12/15 and I received 100% on
> the
> > > Security section. I have
> > > been
> > > trying to remember what question(s) were on
> > > security, but I can't figure it
> > > out...
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott Brenner
> > > CCNP/CCDP
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Andre' Paree-Huff
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 9:10 AM
> > > To: Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
> > > Subject: Re: CID passed with 839, CCDP complete,
> > > details inside
> > >
> > >
> > > Neal,
> > >
> > > I took the CID exam last week and faild by 21
> > > points. I too received a =
> > > ZERO on the security and have talked to at least
> 5
> > > people that have =
> > > taken the cert, some passed some failed but
> everyone
> > > one of them got a =
> > > ZERO for security issues.  I agree I wonder if
> this
> > > was a misprint.
> > >
> > > "Neal Rauhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > message
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > >     100 questions, took me 32 of 120 minutes
> > > allowed, and I walked out
> > > > with an 839 and my spiffy new CCDP :-)
> > > >
> > > > The exam has the following sections and I've
> > > listed my scores
> > > >
> > > > 1 Intro to Internetwork Design        62%
> > > > 2 Campus LAN design                        62%
> > > > 3 TCP/IP network design                    88%
> > > > 4 desktop protocol design                   
> 80%
> > > > 5 WAN design
> > > 76%
> > > > 6 SNA design
> > >     71%
> > > > 7 security issues
> > >     0% (!)(more on
> > > > this below)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Andr=E9 Paree-Huff
> > > A+, ASE, CCDA, CCNP
> > > MCSE+I, NET+, I-NET+
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > AOL AIM: pareehuff
> 
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> .
> chives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> .
> 


=====
Robert Padjen

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to