I think what Natasha meant is that the address is completely legal, but it
could still be the wrong address to use - if it contradicts the particular
organisation's addressing standards, for example. Correct me if I'm wrong,
Natasha (my mails are taking hours to get through at the moment so this
will probably be resolved by the time this hits the list anyway :-)
Dennis, why do you think the address is wrong? It looks OK from the
information you've given us...
JMcL
---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/01/2001
04:39 pm ---------------------------
"Eric Fairfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 16/01/2001
12:49:25 pm
Please respond to "Eric Fairfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: wrong subnet
How is it not correct? The subnet would be 10.1.244.0 with an address
range
of 10.1.244.1-10.1.245.254 with a broadcast address of 10.1.245.255.
--
Eric Fairfield
CCIE #6413
"Natasha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It may be legal but still not correct.
>
> One thing that seems a bit odd though, the gateway is generally a
> smaller number then the node.
> I've never seen it larger but hey I've seen stranger things.
> Natasha
> just a CCNA lol
>
> Eric Fairfield wrote:
> >
> > Looks legal to me.
> >
> > --
> > Eric Fairfield
> > CCIE #6413
> >
> > ""Dennis Ighomereho"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > hello everyone,
> > > someone has just given me an IP address to use which i think the
subnet is
> > > wrong or know is wrong.can someone just confirm this.
> > >
> > > Ip address:10.1.245.253
> > > mask: 255.255.254.0
> > > gateway 10.1.245.254
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
