By having ISP1 advertise both its aggregate and the more-specific,
the routing system conceptually will contain:

      192.168.0.0/16  ISP1
      192.168.2.0/24  ISP1
      192.168.2.0/24  ISP2

CL: And two more routes go into the global tables.  Wasn't CIDR supposed to
stop this kind of thing? ;->

-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent:   Friday, January 19, 2001 2:28 PM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: AS numbers - Is there a global crisis?

>Brian,
>
>Hi!  Funny you bring this up, I just got a phone call on it today.
>Basically, you can have two seperate ISPs and have incoming redundant
>connections without using BGP.  ISP1 will provide a block of IPs from a
>portion of their CIDR block to the "company."  Since this is part of ISP1s
>CIDR block, they already broadcast a route to the rest of the internet
>containing the company's block of IPs.


>
>ISP2 will then also broadcast a route to ISP1's block of IPs (just the
>block!!!).  The tricky part comes when you try to do load balancing between
>the two for incoming traffic!!!
>
>  I am making several assumptions here (that the ISPs will play nice with
>each other among other things).
>
ISP1, however, MUST advertise not its aggregate alone, but both its
aggregate and the more-specific customer block that also is
advertised by ISP2.

Assume the following:

ISP1 has the block 192.168.0.0/16.  This is the only block it advertises.

It delegates 192.168.2.0/24 to the customer.

ISP2 advertises 192.168.2.0/24.

So in the global routing table, there will be two routes:

      192.168.0.0/16  ISP1
      192.168.2.0/24  ISP2

Since 192.16.2.0/24 is more specific than 192.168.0.0/16, the rest of
the world will send ALL 192.168.2.0/24 traffic to ISP2.

By having ISP1 advertise both its aggregate and the more-specific,
the routing system conceptually will contain:

      192.168.0.0/16  ISP1
      192.168.2.0/24  ISP1
      192.168.2.0/24  ISP2

Other AS will install the ISP1 route to 192.168.2.0/24 if their
connectivity to ISP1 is better than their connectivity to ISP2, and
vice versa.

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to