>From my previous uunet experience a 3640 with 128mg of RAM is capable of
handling full routes from both ISP's.  

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, John Neiberger wrote:

> We have a 3640 with 128MB that is multihomed to Sprint and Verio, but we are
> taking customer routes only, which amounts to about 46,000 routes.  The 3640
> hardly even knows that it's turned on most of the time.  The current
> 5-minute average cpu usage is 5%, which is a little higher than normal.  As
> far as memory goes, we have close to 90MB free.  Assuming that the full
> internet routing table is about 105,000 routes now, we have almost 25% of
> that. Approximately 8 MB of DRAM is being used for the BGP table.
> 
> So, you're probably okay taking full routes from two providers on a 3640
> with 128MB DRAM.  But, do you really *need* full routes from both?   Could
> you get by with customer routes, or even default routes?
> 
> In our situation, there just was no need to take full routes from both
> providers.  We simply take customer routes from both and then I have a
> default route pointing to the better ISP to handle unknown routes.
> 
> HTH,
> John
> 
> >  Hi,
> >  
> >  I was wondering if a 3640 with 128MB can handle dual T1's with full BGP
> >  routes... anyone have any experience with this?  Are there any concerns
> >  I should be aware of?  
> >  
> >  thanks!
> >  
> >  _________________________________
> >  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
> 
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to