Hi, Richard
I guess what you are missing is in the confusion between FD and RD.
Feasible Distance: The current best distance (metric) to a
destination. In other words, the metric through the successor.
Reported Distance: The distance from the successor to the destination
network
These definitions are from the same white paper. In the case you've
mentioned, RD is 7181506(minBandwidth:384k, total Delay: 20100),
7693056 would be its FD.
RD is literally "reported distance" from its neighbors, so the delay
and bandwidth of its own outgoing interface to that neighbor isn't
considered in RD.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Jaeheon
On 31 Jan 2001 12:20:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Wilson)
wrote:
>Hi
>
>No matter what I do, I can't seem to get the EIGRP
>metrics to add up. We all know they consist of Delay,
>Bandwidth, Load and Reliability. If K1 and K3 = 1 and
>the rest 0, then the formula boils down to
>(10**7/BW+delay)*256.
>
>I'm looking at an example in the certificationzone
>white paper which shows a bandwidth of 384 kbit and a
>total delay of 40100 microseconds. No matter what I
>do, I can't come up with the reported metric of
>7693056.
>
>What am I missing?
>
>Richard
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
>a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
