Comments inline.
>
> --- Start ---
> Statement: "You can only assign one access list per interface, per
> protocol, or per direction"
>
> Question 1: Would this be correct as to an overall general understanding of
> this statement?
>
> interface ethernet 0
> ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip access-group 1 in
> ip access-group 2 out
> ipx access-group 3 in
> ipx access-group 4 out
>
Yes, this is correct.
> Question 2: Can this possibly imply the following:
> (intuition says not possible because there are duplicate access lists on
> the single interface)
>
> interface ethernet 0
> ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip access-group 1 in
> ip access-group 2 out
> ipx access-group 1 in
> ipx access-group 2 out
> --- Finish ---
This it not correct because access list numbers 1-99 are IP access lists. They could
not possibly be used in an IPX access group statement.
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
