Pierre,
If you want to pick up more details on IOS, you might want to check out the
Inside Cisco IOS Software Architecture book by Cisco Press.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1578701813/o/qid=981751557/sr=8-1/ref
=aps_sr_b_1_1/107-3760323-1100541
- raj
----------
""Pierre-Alex"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is a great URL. Thanks!
>
> Pierre-Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raj
> Singh
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Silly Question!
>
> It stands for "Internetwork Operating System"
>
> A little blurb from Cisco's web site:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/ciscoios.html
>
> - raj
>
> ""Pierre-Alex"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Do you know that the letters in "IOS" stand for? (Like in Cisco IOS
12.0)
> >
> > Pierre-Alex
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dale Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:29 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Fwd: failure notice
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > This came back into my mailbox this morning.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > --------- Forwarded Message ---------
> >
> > DATE: 5 Feb 2001 11:27:55 -0000
> > From: MAILER-DAEMON
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Hi. This is the mailer-daemon. I'm afraid I wasn't able to
> > deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a
> > permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
> > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
> >
> > --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> >
> > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Fri Feb 2
> > 20:37:25 2001
> > To: "Pierre-Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 22:37:25 -0600
> > From: "Dale Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > X-Sent-Mail: off
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Mailer: MailCity Service
> > Subject: Re:
> > X-Sender-Ip: 208.50.127.100
> > Organization: Lycos Mail (http://mail.lycos.com:80)
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Language: en
> > Content-Length: 880
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > I think what they are trying to say is that by using vlsms you are
getting
> > as much efficiency as possible out of the addressing scheme (using a
.252
> > for instance) so that using multipoint does not gain you anything.
After
> > all, you still have to have a seperate address within the subnet for
each
> > circuit. A .248 has six useable hosts, using multipoint with it would
not
> > gain you much. I would prefer to use point-to-point and use a /30 mask.
> >
> > Dale
> > --
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:27:47
> > Pierre-Alex wrote:
> > >On page 14-28 (ICND) It says:
> > >
> > >"Multipoint may not save you addresses if you are using VLSMs"
> > >
> > >What is the rational behind this statement. I would think that using a
> long
> > >subnet mask (i.e. 255.255.255.248 ) would not waste any ip address!
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
> > http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
> >
> > --------- End Forwarded Message ---------
> >
> >
> >
> > Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
> > http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
