On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, ElephantChild wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote:
>
> > I did a traceroute to one of US West's customers... got some
> > interesting results:
> >
> > 13 206 ms 179 ms 123 ms gig0-0-0.phnx-sust1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.253]
> > 14 1016 ms 151 ms 975 ms 207.224.191.2
> > 15 233 ms 124 ms 123 ms 192.168.8.1
> > 16 151 ms 179 ms 123 ms 192.168.100.147
> > 17 247 ms 192 ms 151 ms vdsl-130-13-102-120.phnx.uswest.net [130.13.102.120]
> >
> > RFC 1918 - "Address Allocation for Private Internets" indicates
> > 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) is reserved
> > for private internets. Hops 15 and 16 in my traceroute show that
> > addresses within this range are being used publically.
> >
> > Did I miss something? Have the "for private use only" IP addresses
> > now been given the green light to be used within the internet?
>
> ISTR that there's a BCP RFC somewhere that states that ISPs don't have
> to be clueful anymore. I've seen that several times. IIRC, Concentric
> does it too.
and the reason an ISP would be considered "clueless" for using RFC1918 on
internal point to points is..........?
Brian
>
> ObWhereAreTheyNow: Anyone heard from Chuck? I don't remember seeing any
> posts from him lately.
>
> --
> According to Joyce Melton, "respondability" is cromulent.
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------
I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!!
email me for a quote
Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
318-222-2638 x 109 318-222-2638 x 101
Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net
1401 Oden St.
Suite 18
Shreveport, LA 71104
Fax 318-221-6612
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
