For our company, Cisco does not yet provide reliable
products that scale to OC192 and beyond. Juniper
easily handles this for our backbone interfaces. I
don't work with it directly myself, but that's what
the higher-up engineers have told our group. :>
--- "Buri, Heather H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand from people who work with
> large scale providers,
> Juniper is stronger in the Backbone. I believe
> Cisco is probably still the
> best for overall Enterprise products.
>
> Heather Buri
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cslx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: juniper and cisco
>
>
> it is said that the core technology of juniper is
> better than cisco now,it
> that true?
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====
from The Big Lebowski...
The Dude: You sure he won't mind?
Bunny: Dieter doesn't care about anything. He's a nihilist.
The Dude: Ohhh, that must be exhausting...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
