Tom, I think that you shouldn't wait to do CCIE, because probably when you reach 65, 
CCIE will
no longer be there.
Not many years ago I was preparing to certify on OS/2 (3.0), at that time I already 
had been
working for 6 years with it. When I thought I was ready, the test was on Warp and 
included
Voice Recognition.  The end of the story is I never did certify and probably never 
will.

Tom Lisa wrote:

> Well, I guess this puts me in the "old geezer" category.  I got my Bachelor degree 
>when I
> was 40, my Masters at 45 and my CCNA at 55.  I'm just now starting on the CCNP and 
>hope to
> achieve CCIE status by 65 (Would this make me the oldest to finally get a CCIE?), 
>just in
> time to retire from teaching (my third career) and start on my Ph.D. in earnest.  
>For me
> the joy is in the journey.  Besides, how else am I going to stay one step ahead of my
> grandkids?
>
> Tom Lisa, Instructor, CCNA, CCAI
> Community College of Southern Nevada
> Cisco Regional Networking Academy
>
> Fred Ingham wrote:
>
> > rtc:  I passed my ccie when I was 20 years your senior.  Age isn't an
> > excuse.
> > Fred.
> >
> > rtc wrote:
> > >
> > >  I'm 40--am I getting too old for this stuff? Cant remember anything worth a
> > > damn,
> > > especially the commands nd command syntax
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to