This is just a guess, but how about setting the next hop in the route-map to
the IP address of ISP A?
----- Original Message -----
From: Jacek Malinowski
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:27 AM
Subject: Route-map
I have a big problem with the route-map command.
My network looks like :
ISP A ISP B
| |
| |
| |
--s0--(router 2611)--- s1--
configuration (hypothetical):
interface Serial0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1
ip address 100.100.100.100 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 10.0.0.222 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map POLICY
no ip directed-broadcast
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1
no ip http server
!
access-list 2 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
route-map POLICY permit 10
match ip address 2
set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1
traffic from the network 10.0.0.0 should go through serial 0 and ISP A
traffic from the network 192.168.1.0 should go through serial 1 and ISP B.
I don't understand how is it possible, that ping from 10.0.0.0 goes through
serial 1 and return through serial 0.
there is the policy on the ethernet interface.
I can't run BGP :( because my router is only 2611
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
