Hi,
I want to say,without your own AS and use BGP,you cant do the load balancing
with only one router.One router only permit one interface with "ip nat
outside",this is the problem.I've do the load balancing to two isp using one
pix and two 3620 router,in which two 3620 do the job of nat.You can use
"default-network" plus dynamic routing or link the two 3620 and config
policy routing on them.
Regards.
Johnny Sun
-----Original Message-----
������: Vincxe Fortunato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
������: groupstudy.cisco
�ռ���: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
����: 2001��3��3�� 2:40
����: Re: 2 ISP's
>Terminating 2 ISP links on the same router will not require BGP. Just use
>floating static default routes and load balance out the two links. If you
>own your own AS (public AS), then use BGP for advertisement only.
>
>Vince
>
>
>Oleh Hrynchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Larry Lamb wrote:
>> >
>> > Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will
>significantly
>> > influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that
you'll
>> > use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the
>Mae-East
>> > Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to
>require
>> > a router with 64MB more like 128MB of memory.
>>
>> second is true.
>> 64 Mb isn't enough already since several months ago.
>>
>> > A lot of this type of
>> > configuration will be covered in Internet Routing Architectures by
>Halabi.
>> > It's a Cisco Press title.
>>
>>
>> Generally, I would want to say that answer for the question needs real
>knowledge
>> about several internetworking area.
>> What about propagating of [sub]networks? Whom and what?
>> What about negotiating with both ISP about policy routing and other
staff?
>> (I have some experience with working in a ISP as system engineer and can
>say
>> that it isn't so easy)
>>
>>
>> So, resume is (IMHO): theoretically it is possible of course.
>> But in practice.... let's say, it is not easy so far...
>>
>>
>>
>> CHEERS, ;-)
>>
>> OLEH
>>
>>
>> >
>> > "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97o0uf$pmu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> > >can u give me some more info please
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >"Larry Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > >97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > >> Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well
>depending
>> > >on
>> > >> the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one
>with a
>> > >> floating static route, etc.
>> > >>
>> > >> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> > >> >Greetings,
>> > >> > Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate
>2
>> > >ISP's
>> > >> >on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link.
>> > >> >
>>
>> _________________________________
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
