Tony- I believe that's "it" exactly. Of course we could throw the 5002 in
the discussion & mix everyone up for sure :o) The reason this all seems a
bit moot is that home lab'ers only need Sup 1's for CCIE stuff, Sup 2's are
still much much more expensive, & real world applications requiring a
Catalyst type product would seek to use neither a Sup1 or 2.
.02
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony van Ree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Catalyst 2926 and 2901 Sup Versions
> Hi,
>
> I think what this is saying is that the 2901 can only use a supervisor I
and the 2926T can use either a SUP I or II
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Teunis
> Hobart, Tasmania
> Australia
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 06, 2001 at 09:25:33 AM, Mark Holloway wrote:
>
> > I researched the archives and saw a conflict. Anyone mind advising?
> >
> >
> > Catalyst 2901 = Sup I
> >
> > Catalyst 2926T = Sup ? (I or II)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> www.tasmail.com
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
