AFAIK, this can be true if only one customer is using
all the VCs in a frame network. If nobody else has VCs
on that network, it would not be an issue unless, of
course, somebody physically compromises the media
(copper tapping). Is this accurate?? :>
--- John Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please clarify something for me about
> Frame-relay?
>
> I had always understood that traffic over
> frame-relay was unsecure and
> needed to be encrypted if it was of a critical
> nature. Is frame-relay
> always a shared network? I had thought so but I
> have recently had a
> someone explain to me that they did not need to
> encrypt the data because
> they "owned" the cloud that the pvc ran through. He
> said that it was a
> point to point connection and therefore not over a
> shared network. All
> of our connections are setup using sub-interfaces
> and point to point. I
> still thought that it was over a shared network.
> This did not make a
> lot of sense to me.
>
> Any help would be appreciated. Any links to good
> documentation would be
> helpful as well.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====
from The Big Lebowski...
The Dude: You sure he won't mind?
Bunny: Dieter doesn't care about anything. He's a nihilist.
The Dude: Ohhh, that must be exhausting...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
