Yes, It seems you have not enough IP addresses to run BGP4.So, policy routing is a good
choice for you. I formerly implement the similar solution under a similar situation
except I did NAT on a firewall insteading of on the router.Did you get some additional
public IP addresses from the second ISP?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have one ISP with 192K going to the Internet and I am using NAT not PAT
> to resolve my UN-register to register to the Internet. I now want to add a
> differant ISP now to the same router, a full T/1. What are the pro's and
> con's to this? I need to keep the 192k for reason's but 100 share the 192K
> link and it's slow. I need to setup NAT on T/1 interface I know that? should
> I use policy routing coming from my LAN to the T/1? would this work?
>
> Brian
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
