Ah, this is true. For some reason that didn't even occur to me when I
answered the question. Now, if you were to invert everything and use
these as wildcard masks, would that work? I seem to remember that we
had this discussion about discontiguous wildcard masks.
Regardless, even if discontiguous wildcard masks are allowed, using
them would be bad idea unless you had a very, very good reason for doing
so. Troubleshooting would be a nightmare.
John
>>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/15/01 10:51:14 AM >>>
>I know that there was an earlier posting and a very good explanation
on
>this. So, kindly bear with me.
>
>I am trying to figure out the subnets (and hosts) for this address:
>
>192.10.3.0 with subnet mask 255.255.255.148.
That is not a valid subnet mask. Subnet mask octets can only be:
255 = 11111111
254 = 11111110
252 = 11111100
248 = 11111000
240 = 11110000
224 = 11100000
192 = 11000000
128 = 10000000
0 = 00000000
>
>I am asking this out of curiosity and to learn how to go about this.
>
>Thanks for any help.
>
>Arthur
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
