Cost - I know that in a few sites that I have where I usually use 6500s (for floors with 200+ clients per closet), I can get away with a stack of 2 or 3 3500s (for 100 or so clients) if the lack of backplane capacity is not an issue. This way I still have the gig uplinks and I'm delivering the access switching at a significant reduction over the 6500s. ""Thomas"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 99h10e$4vv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99h10e$4vv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All - I know that it's possible to create cluster for a stack of CAT 3500 > switch. This way, one can use only one IP address for the whole stack. > Beside this benefit, what else can I gain from creating the cluster? > redundancy? Thanks All! > > > _________________________________ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
