Hi Said,

DLCI is locally significant to the router.
However, from the switch point of view, the DLCI defined on the port is 
actually pointing to the router on other end of the PVC.  I was told this 
was called SWAP DLCI.  Is that true ?

Also, I was told there are some PVCs are called gateway PVC.  What is it ?


>From: "Said Khomsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: IP Relay in IPX/IGX
>Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:12:21 +0200
>
>Before you start to change the IP address, you should validate Standby 
>processor card function.  start the process to download the config from the 
>active processor card to the standbay card,
>
>Verify CC redundancy in the node
>Verify that one of the CC cards is in standby
>dspcd x         (where x is the active)
>dspcd xx (where xx is the standby)
>
>once this update will be completed, you can start the IP address 
>modification, thus if the node would "switch cc" by itself, the standby 
>card will be already updated and contains the same database as the active 
>card, the "switchcc" will be transparent and do not cause a failure.(this 
>pb has been seen on software release 8.x.xx/9.x.xx, no idea if it's still 
>exist..).
>
>"cnflan" command is a SuperUser command.
>Command:
>cnflan <IP_Address> <IP_Subnet_Mask> <Maximum LAN Transmit Unit> <TCP 
>Service Port>
>
>Regarding the second question, could you be more specific?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >From: "Charles Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Charles Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: IP Relay in IPX/IGX
> >Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:41:53 -0000
> >
> >If there is a need to change the IP Address, what is the proper procedure
> >without causing node failure ?
> >
> >Also, do you have any idea about SWAP DLCI and Gateway PVC ?
> >
> > >From: "Said Khomsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: "Said Khomsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: IP Relay in IPX/IGX
> > >Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:50:32 +0100
> > >
> > >Each IPX/IGX node to be managed by StrataView Plus (NMS : still called 
>SV+)
> > >must be configured with an IP Relay IP Address (cnfnwip).
> > >The gateway node must be configured with both LAN and IP Relay IP
> > >Addresses.
> > >
> > >The IPX/IGX routing and IPX/AF feeder modes must be configured with 
>read
> > >and
> > >write SNMP community names.
> > >The SNMP community names "public" and "private" are configured in SV+ 
>for
> > >GET and SET respectively as defaults.
> > >
> > >The directly attached node (Gateway node) must be configured with IP 
>Relay
> > >IP address before starting StrataView Plus.
> > >
> > >You must prepare a list of all nodes in the network that will be 
>collecting
> > >statistics for display on this StrataView Plus workstation. If there is
> > >only
> > >one StrataView Plus workstation attached to the network, this list will
> > >consist of all nodes in the network. Every node without a LAN IP 
>address
> > >must have an IP Relay IP address assigned. Use the "cnfnwip" command to
> > >assign IP Relay addresses.
> > >
> > >Note Do not assign the same number to a LAN IP address and an IP Relay 
>IP
> > >address. Each address must be unique.
> > >
> > >Note: if the node is in production and you want to modify the IP 
>address
> > >using a command:"cnflan", this may cause a node failure "switch cc" 
>node
> > >become unreachable, be careful then.
> > >
> > >Try the following URL:
> > 
> >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wanbu/svplus/9_1/aixig/config.htm
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Said.
> > >
> > 
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >From: "Charles Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Reply-To: "Charles Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: Re: IP Relay in IPX/IGX
> > > >Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 06:05:07 -0000
> > > >
> > > >Can i say this is a kind of routing protocol running on WAN switch ?
> > > >Is it a proprietary protocol on Cisco IPX/BPX ?
> > > >
> > > > >From: Pamela Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Reply-To: Pamela Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Subject: Re: IP Relay in IPX/IGX
> > > > >Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:22:15 -0500 (EST)
> > > > >
> > > > >As I recall, it is a method for the switches to relay IP traffic
> > >amongst
> > > > >themselves, within the "cloud" only, for management purposes such 
>as
> > >SNMP
> > > > >and telnet sessions.  Each switch gets an IP address so you can 
>telnet
> > >to
> > > > >it and so it can be managed by the NMS (used to be called 
>StrataView,
> > > > >don't know what they call it now--my info is almost 3 years old).
> > > > >
> > > > >It is a good idea to assign the IP addresses to the switches from 
>among
> > > > >one of the private IP networks such as 172.16.0.0, but not one that
> > > >you're
> > > > >using for any other purpose within your organization.  The switches
> > >will
> > > > >be isolated as far as IP goes, but you don't want the management
> > >station
> > > > >to get confused about which addresses are where.
> > > > >
> > > > >HTH
> > > > >
> > > > >Pamela
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Charles Peter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Can anybody tell me more about the IP relay in IPX/IGX switch ?
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> > > > >http://www.hotmail.com.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _________________________________
> > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >_________________________________
> > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > 
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> > > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at 
>http://www.hotmail.com.
> > > >
> > > >_________________________________
> > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > 
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at 
>http://www.hotmail.com.
> > >
> > >_________________________________
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to