"ip classless" or "no ip classless" only affect the way the router lookup
the ip route table. It does not related to how you define the ospf area or
how you redistribute the route (inc the default route).
""wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99s3lo$8v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Using different type area with differnet option redistribute default
route,
> still the same result?
>
> Would like to hear the result?
>
> rgds;
> Vincent
>
> "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ���g��l��
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Here is a link verifying that my understanding of 'no ip classless' is
> > correct!
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html
> >
> > So, referring to my other threads, why is OSPF overriding classfull
> routing
> > table lookups? I'd rather not retype the whole thing, so if you'd like
> the
> > details of my experiments, refer to the other threads. I just wanted to
> > post this link to show that I wasn't entirely crazy! Maybe a little,
but
> > not entirely.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John the Not-entirely Insane (formerly John the Cheerful, PKA John the
> > Monday Grump)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
