I'm blonde. I don't get it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Vance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CISCO_GroupStudy List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless (partial retraction)
> >it is now 'ip clueless'. :-)
>
> LOL
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Tks | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BV | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sr. Technical Consultant, SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
> Vox 770-623-3430 11455 Lakefield Dr.
> Fax 770-623-3429 Duluth, GA 30097-1511
> =================================================
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless (partial retraction)
>
>
> Geez, you're right. I'm starting to miss the forest because I've looked
> at too many trees!
>
> Yes, even in my experiments, I now remember seeing that the router
> would pick a supernet route for a specific major network. Others
> pointed this out to me and I had completely forgotten that particular
> point.
>
> The moral of the story is: always use 'ip classless' and then quit
> worrying about it.
>
> >From here onward I will no longer refer to 'ip classless'.....it is now
> 'ip clueless'. :-)
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
