can anyone make a strong case for using local addressing
on a Frame relay network? I understand that MCI forces
the use of local addressing.....ATT can go either way, but
if you use local addressing, you have to manage the
addressing yourself.
for those who don't know what local addressing is....the
frame provider's equipment advertises DLCIs to
your router...which you then incorporate into your router's
config. each side of a link has its own DLCI...could be 244-132,
188-234 (head end, remote site)....with local addressing you can clean this
up and make it 244-144, 232-132, 255-155.....basically make
some uniformity.
other than achieving uniformity, are there any other good
reasons for doing this?
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
