True about default route not summarizing, I didn't read the question correctly. Thanks E. John "EA Louie" wrote in message 02a801c0c133$374474e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:02a801c0c133$374474e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here is one other way - take the prefix that you wish to summarize and > create a static route to null 0, and redistribute it into the routing > protocol - it looks like this, for example, for the entire 172.16.0.0 > private Class B network: > > ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0 > router rip > network 172.16.0.0 > redistritute static > > the default route method doesn't summarize at network boundaries, so that's > really a non-solution unless the network isn't advertised at all. > > -e- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Kurkjian" > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 7:08 PM > Subject: Re: methods for summarizing routes in FATKID ospf401 > > > > How about default routes (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0)? > > > > John > > > > Clue Less wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just trying out ospf401 on fatkid, and was reading the hints about > > > summarizing. Here's the hint > > > > > > "There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OSPF routes. One way > > > summaries between areas. The other summarizes between Autonomous > > > Systems. Do you know a third way to summarize routes, which works for > > > any router, running any routing protocol? How about a fourth?" > > > > > > http://www.fatkid.com/html/401_advanced_opsf_-_hints.html > > > > > > Does anyone know the 3rd or other ways and could kindly let me know? > > > > > > Clue Less. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20&t=20 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
