How about a 7 day delay of posting rights. One week after subscribing the
person would have to reply to a message sent to the original subscribing
address. For those seven days the subscriber receives posts but cannot post
themselves. Most spammers use throw-away accounts that are valid for maybe
a day or two. If there was a week delay the account would be closed by then
and the posting rights would never be verified. It would (1) reduce if not
eliminate spammers with spamware that auto-acks the subscription and (2)
force the new subscribers to sit back for a week and read the feed and get a
feel for the list.
-
James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Borghese
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TEEN PORN SPAM... [7:543]
We need some ideas on how to block spam more efficiently. Any suggestions?
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angel Castillo"
To:
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:24 PM
Subject: TEEN PORN SPAM... [7:543]
> I am utterly offended by the previous posting regarding teen porn. I
> sincerely hope that all of the technical people that use this site figure
> out a way to "put a big brain techie hurt" on the person that posted it.
>
> Hopefully the webmaster has some ideas as well...
>
>
> Angel M. Castillo
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=604&t=543
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
