Get the cables you need from Bob lowery @ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you can't get it from him , then go to http://www.symmic.com
You won't have to pay those prices.. would $30 or less do...
Nigel..
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason J. Roysdon
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: back to back cables [7:527]
> I'm looking at a cable in my lab, CAB-HD60MMX-5, which is a nice short
cable
> (5ft) and is DTE 60 pin on one side and DCE 60 pin on the other. It's got
> the Cisco blue and the housing looks just like my other Cisco back-to-back
> cable which is actually a DCE-to-v.35 & v.35-to-DTE cable (the only thing
> it's missing is a Cisco logo, but not all Cisco gear has the logo).
That's
> a Cisco part number and I'm finding it all over the place when I do a
Google
> search, so I'm sure you can find it direct from Cisco with their markup.
> I'd rather just pay $45 for a "Cisco Equivalent Cable" from Pacific Cable
> and the like:
> http://www.pacificcable.com/CiscoCables.htm
>
> Looks like it's available in 3ft, 5ft & 10ft variations
> CAB-HD60MMX-3 LFH 60M TO LFH60M CISCO ROUTER DCE TO CISCO ROUTER DTE
LFH60
> M/M CROSSOVER 3 FT. $45.00 Quantity:
>
> CAB-HD60MMX-5 LFH 60M TO LFH60M CISCO ROUTER DCE TO CISCO ROUTER DTE
LFH60
> M/M CROSSOVER 5 FT. $46.00 Quantity:
>
> CAB-HD60MMX-10 LFH 60M TO LFH60M CISCO ROUTER DCE TO CISCO ROUTER DTE
LFH60
> M/M CROSSOVER 10 FT. $48.00
>
> --
> Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
> List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
>
>
>
> ""Ray Mosely"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > It's simple. Cisco doesn't, to my knowledge,
> > make a back to back cable. I'm not allowed to
> > order a third party cable.
> > Ray M.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 4:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: back to back cables [7:527]
> >
> >
> > Do I even dare ask why you are allowed to use two regular cables but not
> > a back to back cable?
> >
> > Hmm... while writing that I just thought of one good reason. Whenever
> > I order a back-to-back cable I usually get an RS-232 cable. This would
> > tend to limit the clock rate between the two routers. If I needed a
> > higher speed I'd have to find a V.35 back to back cable which seem to be
> > harder to find.
> >
> > If you want V.35:
> >
> > CAB-V35MT=
> > CAB-V35FC=
> >
> > If you want RS-232:
> >
> > CAB-232MT=
> > CAB-232FC=
> >
> > HTH,
> > John
> >
> > >>> "Ray Mosely" 4/13/01 4:29:14 PM >>>
> > I'm sorry to bring up this old old old
> > thread, but I'm in a situation where I
> > need a back to back cable for some 2501's,
> > but I'm not allowed to use a back to back
> > cable.
> >
> > There are two bona fide Cisco cables which
> > can be hooked together to make one back
> > to back cable (at three times the price
> > of a back to back). Anybody know the
> > part numbers of the Cisco cables? It's
> > for back to back on the WAN ports.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ray Mosely
> > CCNA, MCSE
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=681&t=527
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
