can you explain why one should not use the supervisor module to trunk

eager to know

PQ

Dwayne Saunders wrote:

> For starters I would not use the supervisor module to trunk use one of your
> fast Ethernet port on module Two for the trunk.
>
> D'Wayne Saunders
> Senior MIS Operator,CCNA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Chang)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 2:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]
>
> Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com
>
>      I am having trouble getting the trunk up between a Cisco 7513 Router
>      and a Cisco Switch 5500 so that VLAN's 10 and 20 can cross it. It may
>      be because I can't set interface sc0 on the 5500 switch correctly.
>
>      Assume VLAN 10 is   10.10.0.0/16 port 2/1 on Cisco 5500 switch
>             VLAN 20  is  10.20.0.0/16 port 2/2 on Cisco 5500 switch
>
>      Assume ISL Trunk 1/1 connected between 1/1 on Cisco 5500 switch to
>      FastEthernet 3/0/0 to Cisco 7513 Router
>
>      FastEthernet3/0/0.10 = 10.10.1.1
>      FastEthernet3/0/0.20 = 10.20.1.1
>
>      what should I use for the address for interface sc0 on the Switch?
>
>      Interface sc0 determines port 1/1 address on the switch--
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3000&t=2905
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to