wouldn't that be a resource hog
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allen May"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: ACL [7:2882]
> 1 reason would be to separate acl's per internal IP address you're
> permitting/denying access to. 101=specific IP allowing ftp and http,
> 102=different IP allowing http only, etc. It would look cleaner
anyway....
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Donald B Johnson jr"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:19 PM
> Subject: Re: ACL [7:2882]
>
>
> > Why
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "BASSOLE Rock"
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 7:24 AM
> > Subject: ACL [7:2882]
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can we apply more then one ACL per interface?..
> > >
> > >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > Interface Serial1
> > > ip access-group 102 in
> > > ip access-group 103 out
> > > ip access-group 104 in
> > > ip access-group 105 out
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Rock BASSOLE
> > > Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3029&t=2882
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
