Hi again,
The tunnel was not working because our ISP have some filters in their
routers to deny valid IP addresses to across that link.
And our tunnel source/destination addresses were valid IPs (serial0
addresses on both routers).
Then, I've changed the src/dest to our local subnet (ethernet0 addresses on
both routers), and got it working!
Thanks you all.
Regards,
Eduardo
----- Original Message -----
From: "ElephantChild"
To: "Eduardo D Piovesam"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Tunneling [7:5945]
> > My machine (on site A) is 200.200.62.70 / 255.255.255.240 with gateway
> > 255.255.255.65.
>
> Do you mean 200.200.62.65 there? As stated here, A's default gateway
> isn't on the same subnet as A. Won't work.
>
> > * site A:
> > ip route 200.200.46.208 255.255.255.240 tunnel0
> > * Site B:
> > ip route 200.200.62.64 255.255.255.240 tunnel0
>
> Did you try
>
> ip route 200.200.46.208 255.255.255.240 192.168.1.2
>
> and
>
> ip route 200.200.62.64 255.255.255.240 192.168.1.1
>
> instead?
>
> Did you try using traceroute instead of ping to see where you get stuck?
> Did you make sure that the tunnel interface is up and running on both
> routers? Di you try pinging from router A (using extended ping and
> different source interfaces) to see whether the problem was on the
> router or the host?
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Eduardo D Piovesam wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > First, apologies for this long mail.
> >
> > I'm beggining with "cisco routers", and my "first" problem is with
tunnels.
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a tunnel between our two locations with no success.
> >
> > These sites are linkeds to a ISP backbone.
> >
> > The "transport/passenger" protocols are IP. The routers are Cisco 2501
IOS
> > 12.0(6).
> >
> > Addresses:
> > - Site A LAN address : 200.200.62.64 / 255.255.255.240
> > - Site B LAN address : 200.200.46.208 / 255.255.255.240
> >
> > * site A:
> > -------------
> > interface Tunnel0
> > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > tunnel source XXX.YYY.230.234 -- serial0
> > tunnel destination XXX.YYY.49.238 -- serial0 on router on site B
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 200.200.62.65 255.255.255.248
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no ip route-cache
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address XXX.YYY.230.234 255.255.255.252
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip route-cache
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 XXX.YYY.230.233 -- serial port on ISP router
> > ip route 200.200.46.208 255.255.255.240 tunnel0
> > !
> > -------------
> >
> > * Site B:
> > -------------
> > !
> > interface Tunnel0
> > ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > tunnel source XXX.YYY.49.238 -- serial0
> > tunnel destination XXX.YYY.230.234 -- serial0 on router on site A
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 200.200.46.209 255.255.255.248
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no ip route-cache
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address XXX.YYY.49.238 255.255.255.252
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip route-cache
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 XXX.YYY.49.237 -- serial port on ISP router
> > ip route 200.200.62.64 255.255.255.240 tunnel0
> > !
> > -------------
> >
> > My machine (on site A) is 200.200.62.70 / 255.255.255.240 with gateway
> > 255.255.255.65.
> >
> > If I try to ping 200.200.46.209 with the tunnel on routers, I get
"Request
> > timed out". If I remove the 2nd routes from both routers, I can ping
> > 200.200.46.209... :(
> >
> > Where I wrong?
> >
> > Thank you for any hint, clue, help...anything.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Eduardo
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> --
> "Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
> about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
> me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
> people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6147&t=5945
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
