Nate, Thank you very much for pointing that out. Now it does actually make sense that the Ethernet port is assigned E0/0 (duh!). However, I still think it is a very stupid way of Cisco for doing this. Where do you hear a fixed port that is also consider as a "module". Once again, thanks for pointing that out. Sean >From: "Nate Van Maren" >Reply-To: "Nate Van Maren" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6706] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:29:17 -0400 > >But your missing the point... The 2600 series routers has two slots... >With a max of 32 lines per slot, add one and you get 65 for the aux... Same >with a 3640, 4 slots 4x32+1 =129 for aux port... > >Now wait a minute. I didn't say the 2600 has two NM slots. It has slot 0 >which is a fixed lan interface config with two wic slots and slot 1, the NM >slot. That is still two slots. > >from >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/net_m >od2/conntser.htm > >The interface number of a port is determined using the following relation: > >interface-number = (32 x slot-number) + unit-number + 1 > >Thanks >-The Nate > >"Sean Young" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or > > 3600s is > > > > thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for > > either 2600s or 3600s > > > > routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX is still a mystery to me. > > > > Sean > > > > >From: "Neil Schneider" >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > > port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series > > only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with >different numbers > > of ports on them. > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > I don't > > know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > > in > > > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, > > all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are > > referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > might agree with you that > > Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > > out > > > > wrong > > information unless you know it is accurate. > > > > Anyone else would > > like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > > case? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , > > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on > > Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > > > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of > > supporting >two modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it > > doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 > > etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a > > 2600. > >CM > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sean > > Young >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed > > the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on the > > group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > that > > on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > > (sine > > consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > > AUX > > port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > > > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > > > > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX > > port > > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on > > Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform > > is really out of > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all > > platforms? I work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new > > >network engineering folks > > about this especially when it involves > > >async-lines, AS5300, Radius > > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess > > >when Cisco controls about 90% > > market share of the router market, it > > >really doesn't give a f___ about > > these things. No wonder why Juniper > > >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > > the carrier market because it > > makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > > it becomes just as big as > > Cisco then >those guys will start acting > > arrogant). An explaination > > from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. > > Sean > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6750&t=6750 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
